Americans are getting the message about the harmful health effects of cigarette smoking. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the percentage of Americans who smoke cigarettes has dropped from 20.9% in 2005 to 14% in 2017. Despite this progress, however, the CDC reports that cigarette smoking still remains the top cause of preventable death and disease in the United States.
With the significant health threat that cigarette smoking poses, the relationship between the tobacco industry and the public health community is long and varied. This rich history provides a fascinating resource from which community health professionals can learn. An online Master of Public Health degree from the University of Nevada, Reno can help graduates gain the knowledge about this history to help benefit the public.
For example, based on his research of the tobacco industry, Professor Eric Crosbie at the University of Nevada, Reno shares a warning for community health professionals in the article “State Preemption to Prevent Local Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages,” co-written with Laura A. Schmidt and Dean Schillinger.
For the past 15 years, Dr. Eric Crosbie, an assistant professor at the School of Community Health Sciences, has spent the bulk of his research efforts focusing on tobacco and tobacco control, documenting the strategies and tactics used by the tobacco industry.
The Truth Tobacco Documents
For public health and medical professionals, the creation of the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents archive was a landmark event that revolutionized knowledge about the tobacco industry’s influence on public health.
“The Truth Tobacco Industry Document (TTID) is basically a library collection featuring more than 80 million pages of internal tobacco industry documents, including memos, correspondence and discussions between industry representatives,” says Professor Crosbie. The TTID is a publicly available document managed by the University of California, San Francisco.
The TTID was created in 2002 to house internal corporate material accessed during litigation between certain U.S. states and major tobacco companies. The TTID grew in 2006, when a U.S. District Court judge found that the country’s largest tobacco companies publicly misrepresented the health risks of smoking and, therefore, violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. As part of this ruling, these companies are required to ensure that all documents used for litigation regarding smoking and health are available for public consumption until 2021.
“What’s amazing about this archive is that researchers like me are not just speculating on what the tobacco companies are doing, but we can actually go behind the veil and read word for word what is being internally discussed,” says Crosbie.
The Strategic Use of Preemptive Action
Analysis of the tobacco documents archive and other resources provides insight into the strategies and tactics used by the tobacco industry to influence public health policy and public perception surrounding cigarette smoking. According to Crosbie, one particularly concerning strategy employed by tobacco companies was preemptive action.
“By its pure definition, preemption is a legal way to transfer authority from a lower authority to a higher authority,” says Crosbie. For example, transferring authority from a local level to the state level, or from the state level to the national level, would count as examples of preemption.
“Tobacco companies used this authority as a political weapon to basically stop the diffusion of local level policy making for clean air policies,” says Crosbie. In the 1980s and 1990s, clean air policies were becoming increasingly popular and were being implemented at the local level by many jurisdictions. These policies restricted public cigarette smoking in many locations, such as restaurants, shopping centers and hospitals.
“Tobacco companies recognized that if these laws passed, their profit margin would drop ” says Crosbie. “And these tobacco companies were successful, with the passage of a very weak preemptive bill stating that no locality shall pass these very progressive laws anymore.”
Although public smoking restrictions are now enforced across the U.S., the tobacco industry’s use of preemption was successful in slowing down the momentum of these policies.
“The negative public health impacts that result in a situation where the state takes local authority away can be significant,” says Crosbie. “If a student is interested in this kind of work, they need to learn about why policies like the clean air policy are important, because they can change public behaviors. For example, if I’m a smoker, and I am told I can’t smoke in a restaurant but instead have to go smoke outside, then I may not want to smoke, because I don’t wish to leave my friends. There’s evidence to support these polices that can alter behaviors and reduce smoking.”
The Preemption Influence
According to Dr. Crosbie, the strategy of preemption is now being implemented by the beverage industry to stop the momentum of another progressive policy aimed at reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.
Sugar-sweetened beverages include soda, coffee drinks, sports drinks and energy drinks that have added sugar. “The harmful health impacts of sugar-sweetened beverages are well documented, including a connection to the development of diabetes,” says Crosbie. “And what’s beginning to happen is a movement to pass sugar-sweetened beverage taxes — essentially a taxation policy to reduce consumption of these unhealthy products. There is already evidence that these policies are successful at driving consumption down.” For example, an international meta-analysis study conducted by researchers with the University of Otago in New Zealand found that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages went down by 10% in locations with a 10% tax.
“What the article ‘State Preemption to Prevent Local Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages’ is demonstrating is how some states, like California, have passed state preemption bills that ” says Professor Crosbie. “Basically, this is a call to action that history is essentially repeating itself as we see the same preemptive strategy employed by the tobacco industry in the ’80s and ’90s being used presently by the beverage industry.”
What Community Health Professionals Can Do to Support Public Health
Community health professionals take a multidisciplinary approach to understanding public health. These professionals study and evaluate how genetic, social and commercial factors impact the health of a specific community or population. This inclusive approach allows community health professionals to identify harmful health trends and behaviors, taking the appropriate actions in response to try to change these behaviors. Some of the actions taken by community health professions include sharing information with health care workers, informing members of the community about the risks of the behavior through public events and discussions, and proactively educating members of government to influence and shape public health policy.
With increasing research and shared knowledge available about the strategies and tactics used by major corporations, such as those in the tobacco industry, it’s an exciting time to be a community health professional.
Learn More About Advancing as a Community Health Professional
If you want to advance your career in the public health field, learn more about the online Master of Public Health in Public Health Practice from the University of Nevada, Reno. This graduate degree delivers advanced knowledge of the environmental, economic and sociological factors impacting communities right now, and it equips students to make a positive contribution to public health policy.